(5 things you need to know before trusting the supplement.))
“Correlation is not the cause. However, (supplementary companies) can suggest causal relationships such as ‘supporting brain health’ based on ‘heart health support’ or ‘observation research’. DavidMedical Nutrition and Medical Professor of Human Nutrition Research Institute of Columbia University Medical Center. “People do not always know that phrases do not indicate certain evidence of random control tests.” Studies that randomly assign people to intervention groups (supplements) or control groups (placebo). “Random test is the only way to get the cause and effect,” he says.
Many companies say that the benefits of the entire fruit and vegetables are exempted in a similar way. Sara CampbellRutgers-Servick Food Food, Nutrition and Health’s Kinotherapy and Health Associate Professor. Take an apple. Both have a living active compound that promotes health, so removing one or one to remove the side of the health promotion characteristics of the fruit. ”
Reliable science on the health impact of the Greens powder is usually very limited. When CAMPBELL dug into the existing literature, she showed 12 papers after searching for “Green Powder”, which forms a wide range of terms such as “Gut” and “Health” in PubMED, a reliable database of science research. Most papers have focused on green tea powder or have not inspected supplements as a whole. “From a research point of view, it is a huge abuse area,” she says.
Potential danger of green powder
The supplement does not need to prove that what is in his powder is actually in the powder. Unless you test the product independently in the third -party laboratory, you can verify the listed ingredients and check items such as heavy metals, common allergens or harmful toxins. This problem is well documented: one 2023 paper 89 %of the 57 supplements studied, including powder, have found that they have an correct component label. 12 %were contaminated with at least one component prohibited by the FDA.
