Dark Mode Light Mode
Health economy and decision -making science (HEDS) blog: Job search vacancy
Should I meet an expert? You may need to choose from high cost and long atmosphere. The things to change are as follows:
Health economy and decision -making science (HEDS) Blog: New HEDS Discussion Thesis

Should I meet an expert? You may need to choose from high cost and long atmosphere. The things to change are as follows:

Spread the love


If you have diseases such as cancer, diabetes or dementia, or if you need to manage other complex health, you often need a professional treatment of professional doctors.

But as Our new Grattan Institute report Show, too many people should choose from a high cost of long -term waiting or individuals in the public system.

The government should provide more education to professional doctors who lack supply, make wise investments in public clinics, and regulate very high fees claimed by a small number of private experts.

High fees, long waiting, missing treatment

The cost of personal expert promises is high and rises.

On average, the patient’s bill for professional promises Add Annual $ 300. The patient pays the cost of his own for two -thirds of his promise with a professional doctor.

As GP costs increase, there is a national headline, but professional fees are much higher. It has increased 73% since 2010.

Experts, GPS and other Medicare services show the increase in the cost of the burden
The cost of paying for professional treatment has increased faster than other Medicare services.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

People who can’t afford to pay money often get worse over time, paying money and sometimes maintaining health.

Waiting for a free promise in a public clinic can be a few months or years. ~ Inside Victoria and QueenslandThose who have urgent medical requests within 30 days are waiting for a few months to meet experts.

High fees and long waiting times are added to missing treatment. annually, 1.9 million Australians Delay or skip the required professional treatment. There are about half of the cost.

The distance is another barrier. People in the region and remote areas receive much less professional services per capita than residents of urban (even the calculation of services provided). Half Get less Than one professional promise per person per year. In that case, there is no urban community.

Sanjeom also shows per capita service for major cities, regions and remote areas.
People in the area and remote areas receive less professional services.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

We will train the experts we need in the future.

Professional education It takes at least 12 years, so it’s important to plan it in advance. The government cannot cause more heart specialists overnight, or pediatricians cannot cure the elderly.

But now we have no regular projects for the experts we need in the future, and we do not plan to get them. The educational location that the government supports is determined by the priority of the colleges that approve the educational location and the immediate demands of public hospitals.

As a result, we have many types of experts Lack of others. Public hospitals have trained many emergency medical experts because they depend on the emergency room 24 hours a day. But we have too few dermatologists and ophthalmologists: the number of experts is increasing than average.

Bar charts and specialty fields that show doctors' growth from 2013 to 2023
Some types of experts are growing faster than other types.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

The lack of planning is extended to the place where professional education takes place. The doctor tends to stay in the place where the roots are offered and trained. If you lack rural training, there is a lack of rural experts.

In order to solve this problem, the government must plan and pay the educational place that suits Australia’s future health demands. The government must predict the necessity of a particular field of specialized fields. Then, training funding should be related to providing the necessary professional education locations.

In the meantime, in order to fill the gap, the federal government needs to simplify the application for overseas experts to move here. Also, more qualifications must be recognized Similar country.

The most necessary public clinic

Public clinics do not charge a fee and are important for all Australians to receive professional treatment. But the government should be more strategic about where to invest.

There is there gap Expert approach nationwide. After adjusting the differences between age, gender, health and wealth, those who live in the worst region receive about one -third of the services of the most distributed community.

The government needs to fund more for more public services in the most needed areas. They must set a five -year goal to release the interracial approach in the community, which receives minimal treatment in each specialty.

Thermal charts showing additional services for each small area to reach the 25th percentile in each specialty
More services are required for minimal communities.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

we calculation The 81 communities require additional investments in at least one specialty. A million additional promises are needed. Some communities need to reduce overall treatment and invest in many specialty fields.

Due to its long waiting time and not satisfied, the government should also make the most of the investment in public clinics.

Another clinic operates in a very different way. Some have multiple virtual care and few other parts. One clinic can adhere to traditional employee models, while the clinic under the road may have moved to the “top range” model where nurses and all -forces health workers do more.

Passion plot shows the proportion of professional promises in virtual, major cities, and specialty fields
Not all professionals provide virtual promises.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

The government should promote the adoption of a model case by presenting a agenda to modernize the clinic. In addition, it is necessary to introduce a system that can quickly receive written advice from a professional so that GPS can reduce unnecessary recommendations and focus on patients who need treatment.

Inhibit extreme fees

Even if there are more public services and more experts, excessive fees will still be a problem.

Less than 4% of the experts, small ratios (less than 4%) are on average, three times the medicare certain fee. These can only be explained by extreme fees.

In the initial consultation with endocrine scholars or heart specialists who met this “extreme fee” definition in 2023, the average $ 350 is. It was $ 670 for a psychiatrist.

The BAR chart shows an example of extreme fees by specialty fields.
One psychiatrist claimed $ 670, but he is not the only expert who claims an extreme fee.
Grattan Institute,,, Cc by-Nc-SA

There is no effective justification for such a peculiar dimension fee. They go beyond the level of compensation for the doctor’s skills and experiences fairly, and they are not related to better quality and do not receive cross -subsidies for poor patients. The average professional income of much less cost is already the highest in the United States. Nine out of the top 10 occupations are medical specialized.

The federal government has Devoted This is a positive stage. But in some areas, it can be difficult to find a better choice, and the patient can be hesitant.

The federal government must directly solve the extreme fees. In this year, we need experts who claim extreme fees to repay the value of the Medicare rebate.

Professional treatment has been ignored for a long time. The federal and state governments must act now.



Source link

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

Health economy and decision -making science (HEDS) blog: Job search vacancy

Next Post

Health economy and decision -making science (HEDS) Blog: New HEDS Discussion Thesis