Walker, E., NOWACKI, AS: Understanding Equality and Comparison Test. J. Gen. intern. Med. 26(2), 192–196 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8
Google Academic Search
Piaggio, G., Elbourne, DR, Pocock, SJ, EVANS, SJW, Altman, DG, Consort Group FT: Non -consistent and Equal Random Test Report: Expansion of the Consort 2010 statement. Jam 308(24), 2594–604 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.87802
Google Academic Search
Althunian, Ta, de Boer, A., Klungel, OH, Insani, Wn, Groenwold, RH: Randomly define non -climbing margin in double blind examination: systematic review. test 18(1), 107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1859-x
Google Academic Search
IQWIG. General method: Version 7.0. https://www.iqwig.de/methoden/general-methods_version-7-0.pdf. (2023)
High permissions for health: indirect comparison: method and validity. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-02/summary _Report_indirect_comparisons_methods_and_validay_janury_2011_2.pdf. (2009)
European medicine agency. : Guidelines for selecting margins such as non -heat. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-choice-Inferiority-margin_en.pdf. (2006)
European medicine agency. : Matters to consider the transition between superiority and non -climbing. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/Scientific-guideline/points-switching-between-superiority-non-nferiority_en.pdf. (2000)
European medicine agency. : Ich topic e3: Step 5 of the structure and content of clinical research report. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/ScientiFic-guideline/ich- 3-3-3-3. (1996)
European medicine agency. : Ich topic e9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trial 5 Step. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/ScientiFic-guideline/ich-9-statistical-trinCIPLES-TRIALICAL. (1998)
European medicine agency. : Ich topic e10: Choosing control in clinical trials. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/ScientiFic-guideline/ich-e- 10-choice-culoup-linical-trials-5_en.pdf. (2001)
European medicine agency. : ICH E9 (R1): Guidelines for statistical principles of additional clinical trials for estimation and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials in clinical trials. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/ScientiFic-guideline/ich-e9-r1-dendum-sstimands—s Ensitivity-Analysis-Clinical-Trials-Guideline-Statistical-Principles-Clinical-Trials-S_EN.PDF. (2020)
International Council for Harmony of Technical Requirements for Human US Pharmaceuticals: Pediatric Overterest E11A Drawing Guidelines. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_E11A_Document_step2_guideline_20404_0.pdf. (2022)
Eunethta. : Inner validity of randomized control test. https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/UPLoads/2018/01/16_WP7-sg3-sg3-l-int_val_rcts_amend2015.pdf. (2015)
The European Council and the European Union Council. : 2017/745 Regulations for the European Parliament and April 5, 2017, 2017/745, 2017/745, 2001/83/EC, Regulations (EC) NO 178/2009 and 1223/2009 and Representcilcil and 93/42/EEA (EC) NO (EC) NO (EC) 1223/2009 and Representcil and 93/42/EEA relevance.). https://eur-th.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/?uri=Celex%3A32017R0745. (2017)
Pharmaceuticals and medical product regulators. : Clinical investigation of medical devices -statistical consideration. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/edia/62f529bb8fa8f50b57783cf/statistical_considerations_clinical_investigations_ -_may_2021.pdf. (2021)
American Food Pharmacy. : Non -climbing clinical trials to establish effects: Industrial guidelines. https://www.fda.gov/edia/78504/download. (2016)
US Food Pharmacy: 510 (K) Program: A significant equivalent evaluation in a Primaty notification (510 (k)). https://www.fda.gov/edia/82395/download. (2014)
American Food Pharmacy. : Submission of best practices (510 (k)) to select a predicate device for supporting free market notifications: Drawing guidelines for employees of industrial and food pharmacy (2023). https://www.fda.gov/edia/171838/download
AHN, S., Park, SH, Lee, KH: A method of proving similarity using comparison and equivalent statistical test in radiation studies. Radiology 267(2), 328–338 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.1212120725
Google Academic Search
Shan, G., AMEI, A., Young, D.: Efficient non -serial test procedures for simultaneous evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests. computer. math. Methods Med. 2015128930 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/128930
Google Academic Search
Julious, S: ABC with non -climbing margin settings due to indirect comparison. Pharmaceutical. statistics 10(5), 448–453 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/PST.517
Google Academic Search
Duro, EM, Julius, SA, Ren, S.: In a systematic review of cochlere, the survey of the immutability of the effect is associated with the assumption of non -consistent testing. BMC Med. Coastal method. 22(1), 204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01684-9
Google Academic Search
DODD, M., Fielding, K., Carpenter, JR, Thompson, JA, Elbourne, D.: Statistical method for non -climbing tests: useful and used? Systematic review. BMJ open 12(1), E052656 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052656
Google Academic Search
Mo, Y., Lim, C., Watson, JA, White, NJ, Cooper, BS: Non -Memorial Test Non -Memorial Test: Trap and Recommendations. BMJ (Clinical Research ED). 370M2215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2215
Google Academic Search
Schulz, KF, Altman, DG, Moher, D.: Consort 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for parallel group random test reports. Plos Med. 7(3), E1000251 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251
Google Academic Search
US Food Pharmacy: Guidelines for Clinical Trials for Industrial Non Climbing: Drawing Guidelines. https://www.fdanews.com/EXT/Resources/files/archives/n/noninferiorityguidance.pdf. (2010)
Rehal, S., Morris, TP, Fielding, K., Carpenter, Jr, Phillips, PPJ: Non -dials Test: Is inferior? Systematic review of reports of major medical journals. BMJ open 6(10), E012594 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012594
Google Academic Search
Aupiais, C., Zohar, S., Taverny, G., Le Roux, E., BoulquedID, R., Alberti, C.: Inquiry of how non -climbing and equality is evaluated in pediatricians: systematic review. arch. Disc child. 103(11), 1067–1075 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314874
Google Academic Search
OFORI, S., Cafaro, T., Devereaux, PJ, Marcucci, M., MBUAGBAW, L., Thabane, L., Guyatt, G. J. Clin. Epidemic. 16120–27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.022
Google Academic Search
PONG, S., URNER, M., FOWLER, RA, Mitsakis, N., Seto, W., Hutchison, JS, etc. BMJ open 11(4), E04480 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044480
Google Academic Search
Gladstone, BP, VACH, W.: Neptility (NI) margin selection is not protected from the deterioration of therapeutic effects in the average observation study of registration and published NI tests. plos one 9(7), E103616 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103616
Google Academic Search
Acuna, SA, Dossa, F., BAXTER, N.: Meta Analysis of non -consistent and equal tests: ignoring the test design draws a conclusion that is different and misunderstood. J. Clin. Epidemic. 127134–141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.205.034
Google Academic Search
Acuna, SA, Dossa, F., Chesney, TR: Integration of non -climbing tests by integrating non -efficiency benefits: All non -climbing tests are not created. EUR. J. Epidemiol. 36(11), 1097–1101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10654-021-00791-Z
Google Academic Search
LEENING, MJG, MAHMOUD, KD: Non -efficiency benefits and non -climbing margins: Review of non -consistent tests that are not affected by modern highly in clinical heart. EUR. J. Epidemiol. 36(11), 1103–1109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10654-021-00820-x
Google Academic Search
Jacob, I., Badora, K., K., Hewins, A., Nour, N., Gordon, J.: PNS66 Non-Climbing Test in Health Technology Evaluation Do you need a method of non-climbing-cost-minorization? Value health 22S773 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.1968
Google Academic Search
