The Ministry of Health and Human Services sent to members of the National Assembly to support the US policy change decision against Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
One health expert called a document on the safety of the covid vaccine for children and pregnant women, a “intentional medical disadvantage.”
“I think that far from the left field will actually give parliamentarians. Congress members depend on providing valid information to these institutions.” Turrentine markBaylor College of Medicine’s obstetrics and gynecology professor.
Kennedy, an anti -assistant before the Trump administration, was a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on May 27, for the formal process of the institution to adjust the vaccine schedule for adults and children, for pregnant women or healthy children He announced that he would no longer recommend Cobid vaccine. presentation, Made on social platform XHe was angry by many pediatricians and scientists.
According to federal management requested not to be identified because the HHS document to support Kennedy’s decision obtained by KFF Health News was sent to the members of Congress obtained by KFF Health News.
This document is not posted on the HHS website, but it is the first detailed explanation of the agency’s announcement of Kennedy.
This document, titled “Covid Recommendation FAQ”, distorts legal research and quotes other studies that have not been published and published.
Andrew Nixon, director of HHS Communication, told KFF Health News: “There is no distortion of research in this document.
HHS did not respond to the request to nominate the author of the document.
One of the research HHS Documents CITES is investigating the publisher of “potential problems and conflicts of the author of the research methodology and conclusions.” Web page.
“This is the playbook of RFK JR. Sean O’LearyChairman of the Pediatrics Academy, Chairman of the Pediatrics and College of Pediatrics, College of Pediatrics. “We take Cherry-Pick or Junk Science in Good Science to support the premise. It was a 20-year playbook.”
other Quoted This document has a free print that is not reviewed. According to the title of this study, there is a warning that “it should not be used to guide clinical practice because it reports new medical research that has not yet been evaluated.” Preprint was provided a year ago but was not published in peer-reviewed journal.
Supporting Kennedy’s decision, Kobid vaccine’s “after marketing research” has confirmed that “serious side effects such as increasing risks of cardiomyitis and centrifuge,” they have confirmed the conditions of inflammation of the muscles, covers, and permeations of the heart.
The 2024 Preprint misunderstood that it showed myocarditis and pericardial inflammation only for those who received Kobid vaccines and those who were distributed in social media rather than people infected with Kobid. One Co -author This study has been publicly rejected because it has not compared the results between those who have been vaccinated and those who are infected with the covid virus. This study also focused only on children and youth. HHS documents have omitted numerous omissions different Fellow research This showed that after the vaccination after vaccination, the risk of cardinomatitis and pericardial inflammation was greater after contracting covid for all who had vaccinated and non -vaccinations than the risk of the same complications after vaccination.
O’Leary said that some cases of myocarditis were reported in covid epidemic trends in youth boys and young adolescents who were vaccinated, while the ratio decreased after two initial doses of coved vaccines were further intervals.
The youth and adults who are not vaccinated are now only once, and myocarditis is no longer appearing in the data, O’Leyy mentions CDC’s words and no longer appears in the data. Vaccine safety data link. “At this point, the risks we can identify are not increasing,” he said.
In two cases, the HHS memo makes the following claims: Aggressive rebuttal By ~ thesis It is quoted to back up them. Both papers support the safety and effects of the covid vaccine for pregnant women.
HHS documentation speaks of another document. Quoted paper “The placenta blood clotting of a pregnant mother who took the vaccine has increased.” However, this paper does not include mention of placenta thrombosis or pregnant women.
“I’ve read three times now, and I can’t find it anywhere.
If he scored the HHS document, “I will give this” f “.” This is not supported and does not use medical evidence. “
Doctoral councilors said they need to know the references in the paper, but it may not take time to do so. NEIL Silverman, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology professor who instructs a pregnant infectious disease program in UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. “This will assume that this is coming out of the scientific institution, so they’re winking with others who can access this document.
The three Republican offices in the House of Representatives, who were focused on health, including the Bill Cassidy Senator (R-LA.), Did not respond to the request for opinions on whether they received a note. Emily Druckman, a communication director of KIM Schrier (D-Wash.), Of a doctor working at the House of Representatives Energy and Commercial Committee, confirmed that Schrier’s office has received a copy of the document.
“The problem is that many legislators and even employees have no expertise to distinguish these reference.”
CJ YOUNG, Deputy Director of the House of Representatives and Commercial Commission, confirmed that the Democratic Party employee of the Commission received documents from HHS. He said in the past that similar documents would help clarify the justification and scope of administration’s policy change and scientifically accurate, Young said.
“I feel like this is opening a new horizon. I don’t think we have seen the details of the scientific advantage of the first Trump administration, or a level of warning or carelessness that lacks consideration.”
June 4, Frank Pallone (DN.J.) and Schrier I introduced the bill To this end, Kennedy must adopt the official vaccine decision of the vaccination practices or ACIP. Young said that Kennedy’s decision to change the Cobid vaccine schedule without the input of acip vaccine experts who play an important role in setting up CDC policies on vaccine schedules and access.
Kennedy announced on June 9 that he will remove all 17 members of ACIP. He published eight substitutes on June 11.
We want to talk to the components that believe that the current and all employees of the Ministry of Health and Welfare should understand the effects of what happens in federal health bureaucracy. (415) 519-8778 or Contact here.
KFF Health News is a nationwide newsroom that produces in -depth journalism about health problems and is one of KFF’s core operating programs. Learn more KFF.
Use our content
This story can be posted for free (details).
