Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In order to support the decision to change the national policy of the vaccine for the minister’s Covid-19, the Human Health and Service (HHS) sent a document to the legislator to cite the legislative scientific research and misrepresent scientific studies that are unparalleled or controversial.
Health experts explained the “intentional medical misconduct document” on the safety of the covid vaccine for children and pregnant women.
“It was so crazy that our councilors seemed insulting to give them that. They believe that these institutions provide them with valid information and simply do not have it,” he said. Turrentine markBaylor College of Medicine’s obstetrics and gynecology professor.
Kennedy, a semi -batestine activist before assuming the position in the Trump administration, announced on May 27 that the disease control and prevention center (CDC) will no longer recommend vaccines for pregnant women or healthy children, so they will avoid the official process of adjusting vaccination calendars for adults and children.
presentation, It has been mailed to social netsMany pediatricians and scientists were angry.
According to a federal official who supported Kennedy’s decision and obtained KFF Health News, a federal official who requested that he was not allowed to be open to public conversation, he was sent to the council members who questioned scientific basis and the process of his decision.
This document is not posted on the HHS website, but it is the first detailed explanation provided by the institution in Kennedy’s announcement.
According to medical experts, a document entitled “Frequently Asked for Covid-19’s Recommendations for Covid-19” cites some legitimate studies and cite controversial and unpublished studies.
Andrew Dixon, the HHS communication director, told the KFF Health News: “This document does not distort the study. The default data is speaking for itself and raises legal security issues. HHS will ignore or minimize the evidence. We will follow data and science.”
HHS did not respond to the request to identify the author of the document.
One of the research has been quoted In the HHS document, the editor is investigating the conclusions of methodology and research and the conclusion of research, as well as the author’s conflict. Web page Of research.
“This is the strategy of RFK JR.,” he said. Sean O’LearyPresident of the Pediatrics Academy of Pediatrics and Professor of Pediatrics, Colorado University. “Using junk science to choose what is suitable for most good science or support the premise: 20 years of strategy.”
different Quoted In this document, it is a preferred painting that has not been reviewed by other scientists.
The decline in the title of this study warned, “It should not be used to guide clinical practice because it reports about new medical investigations that have not yet been evaluated.”
Prior damage was announced a year ago, but it has not yet appeared in the scientific journal with articles reviewed by colleagues in the scientific journal.
Frequent questions that support Kennedy’s crystals confirm that the “post -marketing research” of the Coved vaccine has a greater risk of cardinomyitis and permatitis, serious side effects such as the state of inflammation of heart muscles, membranes, and pericardrotomy.
On social networks, false statements were distributed in social networks that showed myocardial inflammation and pericardium only to those who had been vaccinated against Covid, not those who were infected in 2024 in advance in 2024. One Co -author He publicly rejected this idea, because he did not compare the results between vaccinations and infected people. The study also focuses only on children and adolescents.
HHS document has been omitted Numerous fellow research They showed that if they were not vaccinated than the risk of the same complications after being vaccinated, they were more risk of cardinomatitis and pericarditis.
O’less said that some cases of myocarditis were reported in teenagers, but the youth and young people who were vaccinated at the beginning of the epidemic were reduced after administering two initial doses of vaccines for Covid at intervals.
Now, young people and adults who have not been vaccinated are no longer appearing in the data, O’ley said. Vaccine safety data link CDC. “The risks we can identify now do not increase,” he said.
In two parts, HHS Memorando makes the following statements: Aggressive rebuttal for the document Promise to support them. Both documents support the safety and efficacy of the covid vaccine in pregnant women.
HHS documents represent different documents Quote “I found that the placenta blood coagulation of the pregnant mother who received the vaccine was increasing.” However, this document does not include mention of placenta thrombosis or pregnant women.
“I have read it three times and I can’t find it anywhere.”
Turrentine said Turrentine said if he had to qualify for HHS documents. “This is not supported and does not use medical evidence.”
Doctors’ councilors should be able to confirm the mention of the document, but it may not take time to do so, he said. NEIL SilvermanProfessor David Geffen Medicine of UCLA instructs an infectious disease program during pregnancy.
Silverman said, “This will assume that this is from scientific institutions, so they’re deceiving not only others who can access this document, but also others.
The three Republican offices in Congress are doctors and have not responded to the request for the opinion of whether or not the office of the Senator and Senator, including the Bill Cassidy Senator (Louisiana Republican Party), received a memorandum.
Emily Druckman, a communication director of the energy and commercial committee’s doctor, KIM SCHRIER (Washington Democrat), confirmed that Schrier’s office has been copied.
“The problem is that even many lawmakers and employees have no experience in analyzing the reference.” But it … Honestly, I have seen more anti -Vacuum propaganda than this. “
CJ YOUNG, deputy director of the House of Representatives’ Energy and Commercial Committee, confirmed that the Democratic employee of the Commission received HHS documents. Previously, similar documents would have helped clarify the justification and scope of change of government policy, and it could be scientifically accurate, Young said.
“This seems to be innovative. I did not think that we lacked consideration of this level of carelessness, details, or scientific advantages in the first Trump administration.”
On June 4, Frank Pallone (New Jersey Democratic Party) and Schrier bill To do this, Kennedy must adopt an official decision on the vaccine of ACIP (Advisory Committe).
YOUNG explained that the motivation of the bill was Kennedy’s decision to change the Covid vaccine calendar without the participation of the ACIP vaccine expert.
Kennedy announced on June 9 that he would dismiss 17 members of ACIP and insisted that the conflict of interest would not explain and replace it. On June 11, he announced eight alternatives, including those who criticized the vaccination order during the Kobid epidemic period.
