The federal government plans to develop a new definition of Ultraprocessed Foods, a wide range of snacks, meals and drinks, which have become the cornerstone of American diet.
Nutrition researcher Usually defined Ultra -compact food as an industrial product that contains ingredients that cannot be found in their kitchen, such as high flat corn syrup or hydrogenated oil. This product often contains artificial flavors, sweeteners and emulsifiers, which are appealing to consumers and can give longer power.
The government can investigate the chemicals and additives, the number of ingredients of the product, or the overall nutritional content when making self -defense. Then you can use this description to form a school lunch policy, regulate food available through federal services such as supplementary nutrition support programs, or to suggest that American food restrictions on ultra -fine food consumption in guidelines. Food and pharmacies, which are working together with the US Department of Agriculture and other institutions, will seek public opinion before setting definitions in the next few months.
Dr. MARTY MAKARY, a commissioner of the FDA, said that food manufacturers have not added sugar, and it will be recommended to mark the “non -trap process” so that the company can induce customers.
“We don’t see ultra -fine foods as a forbidden food,” he said. “We consider them as foods to be defined so that the market can compete with health.”
The idea that consumers can get out of the way to avoid these items is increasing concern about the potential damage of ultrasound, including many breakfast cereals, instant noodles, protein bars, meal alternative shakes, fragrant yogurt and hot dogs. Scientists are increasingly connected to health results, such as type 2 diabetes, heart problems, some types of cancer and gastrointestinal problems.
Kyle Diamantas, deputy director of the FDA Food Department, said that there is a “obvious area” to consider when making the definition, including synthetic dyes, emulsifiers and preservatives.
Diamantas said, “We do not have this new novel material to help maintain a twin key in the shelves for six years in the kitchen, and he also suggested that the standard definition of ultrasound foods can be used to regulate the meals provided to military members, prison and veterans and military service hospitals.
The government will face push bags in some corners of the food industry, dependent on preservatives and artificial materials to produce low and convenient foods in a large scale.
Marion Nestle, an honorary professor of nutrition, food research and public health at the University of New York, said that all the definitions of the government are “angry” by the food industry.
By defining ultra -fine foods, the government will also measure the weight on the problem of dividing nutrition experts and confusing consumers. Does vegetable meat and milk belong to the same category as soda and candy bars? And are all ultra -fine foods inherently harmful to health? Some are good Various yogurt, whole grain bread and cereals contain valuable nutrients and are related to positive health results.
Maya Vadiveloo, an associate professor of nutrition at Rod Island, said that a wide range of terms can “evil” foods that don’t necessarily harm consumers.
Federal push follows Recent efforts A zoom Note that restricts ultra -fine foods sold and provided at school. In Arizona, lawmakers defined ultrasound as foods with specific food additives such as artificial dyes. But Brenda Davy, a nutritious professor at Virginia Tech, said that the additives may be part of making certain ultra -fine foods as bad health. And if the federal definition follows Arizona’s example, he said that he will miss a large number of high -growth foods, like a serial with sugar that does not use certain edible colors.
“If their focus is too narrow, it can be limited to improve health,” she said.
Nevertheless, the Federation’s definition will be a “great progress,” Dr. Nestle said. She said she could regulate whether a new type of warning label or the government can regulate whether food manufacturers can market minute food to children.
“If you have justice, they can all catch it,” she said. She added: “It’s very important.”
