In the tube, the skull is literally a squid in a strange shape, and the teeth are randomly forcibly forcibly forcibly forcibly forcibly forcibly, faced, shit, shit, and probably kind. In fact, we cannot remember life as a baby. But a new study shows that the reason we enjoy that little luck has been misunderstood so far, and as a result, the baby does not forget that we thought.
It is difficult to study the memory loss of infants who are technically known to forget their life before the age of 3-4. The reason is clear. The baby is not a good word for famous words.
Nick Turk-Browne, a professor of psychology at Yale’s Faculty of Art, explained: name This week. “But it is out of the table when you deal with preliminary infants.”
Obviously, a different approach was needed.
“We scaned the brain of infants who were awake with functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing subsequent memory work, and investigated the mechanical foundation of this infant’s memory loss. It may sound like a small baby, but rest assured.
If the baby recognized the copy, the team had to be able to say: “When the baby saw something before, we expect them to see more when they see them again,” Turk-Browne said. “In this task, if an infant stares at more new images next to the previous image, it can be interpreted as a baby recognizing it as familiar.”
But what will happen Inside Their little hair? So far, the widespread wisdom has been that the baby cannot form memories of episodes because some of the brains have not yet been developed. It was a reasonable hypothesis, but it was not actually impossible or confirmed or disproved (it does not help me to stay for a long time or not to say that it is not very helpful to pay attention as it does not speak big).
But the barrier has gradually collapsed in the last decade. Now the team was able to measure the baby’s hippocampus throughout the work. What they found were completely opposed to what previously assumed about the infant brain. The longer the baby sees the more familiar image, the stronger the activities observed in the hippocampus.
Not only that, but it was happening specifically in the area related to the memory of the adult episode. The result is that “the ability to encode individual memory is online online.” In the case of infants at the age of 1, the effect was noticeably stronger, but -26-half of the powerful samples were described. They all existed in all, suggesting that episode memory can be well formed three to four years ago.
Of course, this leads to a natural question. If our brain is making this memory, where do you go?
Well, we are not sure-and not Turk-Brown and his colleagues. But they have some ideas. Perhaps the memory is made, but it is stored only in the short term. Perhaps the team’s ongoing research has been temporarily implied, but there is still a memory, but anyway, our adult brain is not accessible anyway. Turk-Browne explained, “Infant memory loss is a search problem.”
“We are trying to track the durability of the hippocampus of the hippocamps of childhood,” he said. “And despite the inaccessibility, in some form, in some form, we started to entertain the possibility of radical and almost science fiction that can withstand adults.”
This study has been published science.
