Dark Mode Light Mode

SUSAN G. KOMEN FOUNDATION calls the Supreme Court to protect preventive treatment.

Spread the love


The Supreme Court will be controversial on Monday, in terms of preventive treatment, which can affect the drugs that help to prevent HIV from Canterive.


Audrey Baker, a resident of DC-AREA, said the cancer screening saved her life. (Courtesy Audrey Baker)

The Supreme Court will be controversial on Monday, in terms of preventive treatment, which can affect the drugs that help to prevent HIV from Canterive.

The case of the judge is between the ministers of the health. Robert F. Kennedy, JR. v. Braidwood Management, Inc. In 2020, if some Christian businesses and conservative employers filed an objection to the Affordable Care Act, the need for a private insurer was raised in 2020. Please deal with certain preventive treatment servicesBased on religious beliefs.

This case has changed since then, and now this case focuses on how to appoint a task force that determines what should be dealt with in front of the High Court.

The lower court decided that the US preventive service task force violated the appointment of the Constitution because the president did not decide who was sitting in the task force. Last year, the fifth tour of the appeals supported the decision.

The problem is now whether the Supreme Court will support the decision of the lower court.

“If the Supreme Court supports the decision made by the Court at the end of last year, we will set a precedent to endanger the service we are familiar with,” he said. SUSAN G. KOMEN Breast Cancer Foundation.

As the Ministry of Justice claimed that it was under control of health and human services that appointed members, the Task Force was defended by the Trump and the Viden administration.

if With the Supreme Court and business The company, which signed the lawsuit, does not need to deal with the prevention treatment recommended by the task force that goes back to 2010.

The Kaiser Family Foundation has been selected as a coverage of other organs, so labor therapy, vaccine and breast ancoys can be exempted, but other screens on colon work and lung cancer can be at risk.

“The true fear will be a rude to set a precedent for more companies, more organizations to create the same challenge, and basically to have the foundation to basically change this preventive service environment we know.

Cancer screening saved her life. Now she is defending that health care insurance

The importance of cancer screening is to help Audrey Baker to beat breast cancer. In 2017, everyday breast angiography found an 8mm tumor that was found to be cancer.

Baker had no family history of breast cancer or symptoms when he was diagnosed.

“The breast angiography) was able to react very quickly and react very quickly so that I could be surgery, radiation, clean the margin, and still talk.

Baker said early detection approached her because she saved her life. She served as Chairman of Komen Community Board of Susan G. KOMEN DMV Tri-State Area.

If the Supreme Court does not overturn the ruling of the lower court, it can lead to more people because people who oppose cancer screening and other preventive treatment must pay their pockets.

“In order for other expenses, burden, conflicts, challenges, challenges, or frictions, the proportion of people to be selected will go down and negative results will rise.” “It’s logical at the end of the day.”

Guthrie added that the judicial advocacy was a “new border” of the Foundation and later submitted amicus briefings to the Court and the current Supreme Court.

Guthrie said, “In the case of the breast cancer community, there are many free benefits that the USPSTF (US Prevention Service Task Force) guidelines, that is, the fact that women can be screened annually from age 40.

She said that genetic counseling and risk fertilized drugs are also included in the guidelines produced by Task Force. According to Guthrie, these have lowered their mortality and expanded their access to the services needed in the breast cancer community.

“If you describe it where there are other public health areas that affect this event, the result is truly destructive and dangerous precedents for public health.

Sign up here and identify the news and daily headlines that are delivered to the emailed letter box.

© 2025 wtop. All rights holdings. This website is not for users located in the European economy.



Source link

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

Climate change can worsen allergies.

Next Post

Fitness coach shares the most dangerous and harmful diet for weight loss. 'There is no magic medicine or shortcut' | health