Appeals dealing with AI in online treatment, the development of health insurance of the House
Illinois are interested in the use of artificial intelligence in health care.
Bob Morgan spokesman D-Deerfield supports two legislation that restricts AI use in an online treatment service and restricts the use of AI in a decision-making process that determines the scope of personal health insurance.
Morgan has an email to the National Assembly’s news Illinois, “The artificial intelligence is here.” In relation to health insurance, the stake is so high that it is simply high enough that an unidentified automation is not confirmed to determine whether someone is treated for life or faces financial ruin. “
One of MORGAN’s sponsorship bills- House of Representatives 1806Discussing the use of AI in online mental health services was unanimously passed by the House Health Care License Committee on Wednesday.
If it is enacted, this bill prohibits the approved mental health professional to provide support for treatment or psychotherapy sessions using AI.
Morgan said that the National Association of Social Workers received more reports from these online service users, and they did not know that they were interacting with the AI chat butt during the session.
“I think that the introduction of AI to mental health care can be quite clear, but I think it’s definitely a serious danger that can lead to dangerous and threatening consequences.” Again, the ability to apply the response based on nonverbal signals and emotional tone of nonverbal signals and emotional tone when AI exerts ethical judgments or a person is in crisis.
Morgan’s other AI bills, House of Representatives 35Health insurance providers will use AI to change how to make a decision on customers’ insurance. The bill was delivered from the House of Representatives Insurance Committee on 11-6 votes last Tuesday.
Morgan briefly explained the goal of this bill as “preventing inappropriate decisions.” If the HB35 is enacted by law, it is prohibited for a health insurance company to reject, reduce or terminate the scope of insurance coverage in the patient, depending on AI. Instead, these AI-MADE decisions should be “reviewed” by human employees who have the authority to ignore it.
Morgan said that all major health insurance companies are currently using AI and are helpful and harmful to customers. He said that the use of those who use AI to make a guarantee decision for consumers without actual people’s supervision is one of such harmful methods.
“Today we sit here and the insurance company uses AI to decide what health insurance claims are,” he said. “We are completely blinded to what it is and how to oppose us and our arguments.”
At the end of last year, Propublica was published inspection In EVICORE, EVICORE, a company used by many major insurance companies in the United States, has been used to make an AI algorithm to make a decision on consumer application.
Morgan mentioned a lawsuit against CIGNA, HUMANA, and UnitedHealth Group, who recently submitted a lawsuit against CIGNA, HUMANA, and Unitedth Group. I saw a lawsuit.
no way suit In 2023, it was submitted to the UnitedHealth Group and the decision was made last month. 7 out of 7 counts dismissed health finance. Reported.
Morgan’s bill aims to curb this practice.
“The patient maintains fairness, responsibility and consumer protection in a system that affects millions of lives by confirming that human review is needed in the AI -centered decision that has a negative impact on the patient.” “This is not to refuse innovation, but to provide services to people, not other ways.”
There is HB35 the opposite In three institutions, including the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, US Health Insurance Experts and Illinois ACLU. But there is this bill Support From 10 others, including the Illinois Medical Association, Illinois Pharmacist Association, and the Illinois branch of the National Social Workers Association.
