Dark Mode Light Mode
How can the air you breathe affect your brain?
Is next-generation sequencing for rare disease diagnosis worth the cost? A user-based approach to valuation
2025 Global Tuberculosis Report

Is next-generation sequencing for rare disease diagnosis worth the cost? A user-based approach to valuation

Spread the love


  • Lewis, C., Skicon, H., Jones, R.: Living without a diagnosis: A parent’s experience. genet. test. mole. Biomarker 14(6), 807–815 (2010)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Michaels-Igbokwe, C., McInnes, B., MacDonald, KV, et al.: (Non-)standardized testing: a diagnostic odyssey in children with rare genetic disorders in Alberta, Canada. genetics in medicine 23(2), 272–9 (2021)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Oei, K., Hayeems, RZ, Ungar, WJ, Cohn, RD, Cohen, E.: Genetic testing in children in complex treatment programs. children 4(5), 42(2017)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • van Nimwegen, KJM, Schieving, JH, Willemsen, MAAP, et al.: Diagnostic pathways in complex pediatric neurology: a cost analysis. euro. J. Paediatr. New roll. 19(2), 233–239 (2015)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Richards, J., Korgenski, EK, Srivastava, R., Bonkowsky, JL: Cost of the diagnostic odyssey in children with hereditary leukodystrophy. neurology 85(13), 1167–1170 (2015)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Regier, DA, Weymann, D., Buchanan, J., Marshall, DA, Wordsworth, S.: Assessing health and non-health outcomes through next-generation sequencing: approaches, challenges, and solutions. value health 21(9), 1043~1047(2018)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Phillips, KA, Deverka, PA, Marshall, DA, et al.: Methodological challenges in assessing the economic value of next-generation sequencing testing: challenges are many, but solutions are not enough. value health 21(9), 1033~1042(2018)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Christensen, KD, Phillips, KA, Green, RC, Dukhovny, D.: Analysis of the costs of genome sequencing: lessons learned from the MedSeq project. value health 21(9), 1054–1061 (2018)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Regier, DA, Friedman, JM, Makela, N., Ryan, M., Marra, CA: Evaluating the benefits of diagnostic testing for genetic causes of idiopathic developmental disorders: Willingness to pay for families of affected children. Clean. genet. 75(6), 514–521 (2009)

    article
    Cass
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Marshall, DA, MacDonald, KV, Heidenreich, S., et al.: The value of diagnostic testing for parents of children with rare genetic disorders. genet. Med. 21(12), 2798-2806 (2019)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Lewis, MA, Stine, A., Paquin, RS, et al.: Parental preferences for genome sequencing for nonmedically amenable conditions in children: a discrete choice experiment. genet. Med. 20(2), 181–189 (2018)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Peyron, C., Pélissier, A., Béjean, S.: Favoring heterogeneity when it comes to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment with parents of children with rare genetic diseases. Soc Sci Med 214125–132(2018)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Goranitis, I., Best, S., Christodoulou, J., Boughtwood, T., Stark, Z.: Preferences and values ​​for rapid genomic testing in critically ill infants and children: a discrete choice experiment. euro. J. Hmm. genet. 29(11), 1645~1653(2021)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Bridges, JFP, de Bekker-Grob, EW, Hauber, B., et al.: A roadmap for increasing the usefulness and impact of patient preference research in health-related decision-making: a best practices report from the ISPOR Task Force. value health 26(2), 153–162 (2023)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Epstein, RM, Peters, E.: Beyond information: Exploring patient preferences. Zama 302(2), 195–197 (2009)

    article
    Cass
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Epstein, RM, Fiscella, K., Lesser, CS, Stange, KC: Why the country needs a policy push for patient-centered health care. Health Related (Millwood) 29(8), 1489~1495 (2010)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Drummond, MF, Sculpher, MJ, Torrance, GW, O’Brien, BJ, Stoddart, GL: Methods for economic evaluation of health care programs. 3rd edition New York: Oxford University Press (2005)

  • McIntosh, E., Donaldson, C., Ryan, M.: Recent advances in cost-benefit analysis methods in healthcare. A combination of art and science. pharmacoeconomics 15(4), 357–367 (1999)

    article
    Cass
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • McIntosh, E.: Using discrete choice experiments within a cost-benefit analysis framework: Some considerations. pharmacoeconomics 24855–868 (2006)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Vass, C., Boeri, M., Karim, S., et al.: Explaining preference heterogeneity in discrete choice experiments: ISPOR Special Interest Group report. value health 25(5), 685–694 (2022)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Lancsar, E., Louviere, J.: Conducting individualized choice experiments to inform medical decision-making: A user’s guide. pharmacoeconomics 26661–677 (2008)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Grosse, SD, Wordsworth, S., Payne, K.: Economic methods for assessing the value of genetic testing results: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis. genet. Med. 10(9), 648–654 (2008)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Buchanan, J., Wordsworth, S.: Assessing outcomes associated with genome sequencing: a roadmap for future research. Pharmacoeconomics – Open 3(2), 129–132 (2019)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Hole, AR, Kolstad, JR: Mixed logit estimates of willingness to pay: Comparing preference and WTP spatial models using data from a health-related choice experiment. empire. ikon. 42(2), 445–469 (2012)

    article

    Google Scholar

  • Train, K., Weeks, M.: Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space. In: Alberini, A, Scarpa, R. (eds.) Application of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics: Springer Netherlands (2005).

  • Daly, A., Hess, S., Train, K.: Finite moment guarantees for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. transit 39(1), 19~31 (2012)

    article

    Google Scholar

  • Czajkowski, M., Budziński, W.: Simulation errors in maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models. Journal of Choice Modeling 3173–85 (2019)

    article

    Google Scholar

  • Small, KA, Rosen, HS: Applied welfare economics using discrete choice models. econometrics 49(1), 105–130 (1981)

    article

    Google Scholar

  • Lancsar, E., Savage, E.: Deriving welfare measures from individual choice experiments: Inconsistencies between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health economy. 13901–907 (2004)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Ryan, M.: Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: Comments on Lancsar and Savage (1). health economy 13909-912(2004)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Khajavi, S.: Optimal peak load pricing, investment and service levels on urban streets – a numerical example. Transfer. resolution. suggestion 8077–14 (1981)

    Google Scholar

  • Tsiplova, K., Zur, RM, Marshall, CR, et al.: Microcosts and cost-outcome analysis of clinical genomic testing strategies for autism spectrum disorders. genet. Med. 19(11), 1268~1275(2017)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Abbott, M., McKenzie, L., Moran, BVG, et al.: Continue the sequence? Toward an economic evaluation of whole genome sequencing for rare disease diagnosis in Scotland. J. Community Genet. 13(5), 487–501 (2022)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Tinelli, M., Ryan, M., Bond, C.: What, who, when? Integrating discrete choice experiments into economic evaluations. Health economy. rotation. 6(1), 31 (2016)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Sargazi, N., Takian, A., Daroudi, R., et al.: Cost-benefit analysis of human papillomavirus vaccine in Iran. prevention journal 43(6), 841–857 (2022)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Keller, E., Botha, W., Chambers, GM: Does in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment provide good value for money? Cost-benefit analysis. Front. Globe. women’s health 4971553(2023)

    article
    pubmed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Van Der Pol, M., Shiell, A., Au, F., Jonhston, D., Tough, S.: Eliciting individual preferences for health care: a case study in perinatal care. health expectations 13(1), 4~12(2010)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Mühlbacher, A.C., Sadler, A.: The stochastic efficiency frontier: a framework for cost-effectiveness analysis implemented for hepatitis C treatment options in Germany. value health 20(2), 266–272 (2017)

    article
    pubmed

    Google Scholar

  • Statistics Canada: Income Highlights Table, Census 2016. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada (2016).



  • Source link

    Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

    By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
    Add a comment Add a comment

    Leave a Reply

    Previous Post

    How can the air you breathe affect your brain?

    Next Post

    2025 Global Tuberculosis Report