Bioethics Forum Essay
President Trump said to pregnant women last week, “Do not take tile lenol. There is no evidence of increasing the risk of autism, ADHD or intellectual disorders in tile lenol during pregnancy. The misunderstanding of scientific evidence is not just a matter of report, but one of the ethics. Bioethics must call this investigation based on fear of this misunderstanding.
It is complicated to decrypt whether medication is harming the fetus. Some of the challenges are to be reluctant to conduct research during pregnancy. Revision of general rules in 2018 is removed from the list of people who consider pregnant women as “vulnerable populations”. Main organization have I called the scientific community Solve the gap of evidence Responsible included Pregnant women in pregnant women in biotechnology research Less than 1% of clinical drug tests in women between 18 and 45 years old Pregnant participant.
Surprisingly, despite these challenges, Tylenol is one of the few drugs that we have good evidence. This is not because of the random test, but because the use of tile lenol is so widespread that it has a powerful epidemiological data to identify whether it is in danger. Initial research suggests a connection between pregnancy and autism in tile lenol. Confused factors, small samples and associations were incorrectly involved, suffering from suffering..
There are American gynecologists and obstetrics and gynecologists Emphasized Two best quality research (including) One published in JAMA last year-“There is no important connection between the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy, autism of children, ADHD or intellectual disorders.” Check the acog The acetaminophen remains a safe and reliable option for pain relief and heat during pregnancy.
Given the definite evidence of evidence, the admonition for Tylenol suggests that other problems are progressing. Of course one is fear Tali Domide is afraid of sedrings with mind and thought. About the use of drugs during pregnancy -in clinical studies. How the fear appears is a lot of what we usually think about pregnancy and how the biological ethical community should respond to this latest attack on reproductive health care.
First, bioethics should pay attention to the tendency to be embarrassed when a broader factor is actually criticized when a large factor that is not related to pregnancy is accused of being criticized for his mother’s health. In the 1970s, “Refrigerator Mother” -Mother was accused of autism of mothers -children who lacked emotional warmth. This idea is controversial, but it shows that the cultural tendency remains to be responsible for the mothers in the recognized challenges faced when their children develop. Moreover, the criticism and surveillance of the pregnant body is not distributed the same. Cross ethics and legal scholars have long argued. The policy of criminalizing pregnancy was an unbalanced burden on black mothers.. Bioethics must continue Emphasize and call this injustice.
Second, bioethics and clinicians are when treating pregnancy patients The risk of intervention is often failure Intervention. During pregnancy, parent heat is a known risk factor of the fetus. Neurological defects,,, Limiting in the uterus, immaturity and nerve development disorders. Without a safe alternative Acetaminophen remains a thermal reduction in choice. In pregnancy.
Third, fear of Tylenol strengthens the idea that neuronal disorders are clearly disadvantageous. Ideas that are not strongly agreed to supporters of disabled scholars, autism and nerve diversity movement. Bioethics must raise this critical voice. Shannon Rosa requires higher support that autism needs. American society insisted:I returned so terribly.“Politicians are not interested in autism and their family’s welfare.” The scientific community is better for nerve diversity. Investigation based on fear of connecting between tile lenol and autism, “(A) Useful life is worth it– This includes people with higher demands and people of color. It means everything. ”
When responding to wrong information about pregnancy, bioethics cannot be responsible for the “safer than sorry” approach. Medical recommendations should be based on scientific evidence with good reputation with richness of the safety of Tylenol during pregnancy. We must recognize the complex social and structural power that forms pregnancy health, motherhood, and children’s results, and condemn the investigation that blame and be ashamed of mothers for all births.
Bioethics also avoids the birth of a child with disabilities or characteristics. Nerve development disorder frame such as autismDestiny worse than death“We contribute and devalue the living experiences of people with nerve development differences. At the same time, biologists should include people who are pregnant in clinical research and create data necessary to solve complex questions such as contributing to children’s nervous development.
Bioethics do something in the current environment where experts are dismissed and doctors are inorganic for political agenda. Regarding gender and pregnancy, these attacks argue with the unpleasant displeasure of promoting dangerous games that condemn their mothers and alienate human differences. Clearly, pregnancy patients must be protected. Through ~ Not a study From ~ research. We require clinical and biological ethics to condemn harmful practices in biotechnology studies disguised as pregnancy treatment and clinical pearls. This includes recognition that the “safer safer than sorry” approach is safe or does not respond to the basis of evidence. Rather, it is the product of fear and paternity thinking to prioritize the safety of the fetus as a priority, but ultimately harms both mothers and children.
The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this essay are the author’s opinion and do not indicate the views of each organ or sponsor.
Rita Dexter has a first -year Ph.D. from Rice University.
BA’s sophie L. Schott is a second -year medical student in Houston. @mybestschott
Dr. Miranda R. WAGONER is an associate professor of sociology at RICE University and investigates the social and cultural levels that solve problems in reproductive ethics and women’s health policies.
Anne Lyerly of MA MD, a Hastings Center Fellow, is a research professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and Obstetrics and Gynecology. Her research focuses on how to give people a meaning to reproductive events, dealing with socially and moral complex problems in women’s health and reproductive medicine.
