The Trump administration recently issued a declaration on what is a problem with the US health, but many actions have conflicted with the answer.
Scientists and public health advisors are seeing deep separation from what the government has told me about health, especially “especially”.Maha ReportPresident Donald Trump Recently announced In the White House -and it actually does it.
For example, the report says more research on the cumulative effects of chemicals in chronic diseases and environments. However, the Trump administration’s cancellation of mass federal research subsidies derailed the subject.
This report accuses of broad and unbelievable research on the research that is supported by the industry for chemicals and health. However, the executive is trying to cut government funds that can play the opposite role.
Alonzo Plow, the chief scientific officer of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a charity focusing on health, said, “There are many inconsistencies between investigation and action.
This report, the cornerstone of President Donald Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, is a health and human service minister Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And a committee consisting of other top administrative officials.
It quickly became famous Source without footnotes and It is included It was produced with the help of artificial intelligence. White House reporter Karoline Leavitt explained the issue as a “format”, and the administration revised the report.
The White House and the Ministry of Health and Welfare spokesman did not respond to this article.
To get a bigger picture, consider the case of shit diaper.
According to the MAHA report, environmental chemicals can be a risk of children’s health. “The state should better understand how it can affect the cumulative load of multiple exposure and the health of children.”
The Environmental Protection Bureau was considering the same line in 2020. I asked scientists to propose How to study children’s exposure to chemicals in soil and dust. For young children, eating particles by putting particles on the ground or floor can be an important means of exposure to contaminants such as herbicides and pesticides.
One subsidy went to the scientist team of Johns Hopkins University and the University of California-San Francisco. Researchers have been approved to collect samples from the homes of people, including dust and diapers.
But beyond the execution of small -scale tests, they failed to analyze urine and stool samples this spring, so Keeve Nachman, an environmental and engineering professor at Johns Hopkins, said.
The agency said in a May 10 notice, “The goal of this award is no longer consistent with EPA funding priority.
