This case focuses on the prevention management requirements of Obamacare. For example, religious opponents say that HIV drugs will “conspiracy to promote homosexual behavior.”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. supports measles vaccines after visiting West Texas.
One of Obama Care, one of the most popular parts of Obama Care, is facing an investigation in the Supreme Court Challenge for the Landmark Health Insurance Act, which is still fifteen years later, 15 years later.
Two Christian ownership projects and some of Texas argue that their health insurance plans should not deal with medical examinations and drugs against religious evidence. For example, paying for a specific HIV preventive drug will be “conspiracy to promote homosexual behavior.”
In the twist of the first Trump administration, who attempted to kill Barack Obama’s groundbreaking health insurance law, Trump’s Ministry of Justice will defend the law if the High Court observes the law on Monday.
It shows the support of ideological good,,, While the Supreme Court increases the possibility of not being with the challengers, the victory can give the Trump administration the power to choose and select the precautions to deal with and self -defense.
“What happens ~ Later This case can be more important than the rules of the Supreme Court. ”Laurie Sobel, the deputy director of women’s health policy, KFF, a non -party health research organization.
‘If this benefit disappears, people will know. ‘
The requirement that tens of millions of Americans should be included in the 2010 AFODABLE CARE ACT should include a health insurance plan, which includes services that detect diseases and prevents diseases.
The legal issue at the center of the Supreme Court Obama Care is that one of the three expert groups recommended for service insurance is so powerful that it should be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate in accordance with the Constitution.
If the Supreme Court agrees with a Texas business, a health insurance company recommended by the US Prevention Service Task Force after the ACA is enacted. (Other services, such as vaccines recommended by other experts, are still in conflict in other aspects of the case in the lower court.)
For example, in 2021, Task Force expanded the recommendation for the selection of colon cancer for people aged 45 or older due to the increase in diagnosis of young people.
Katie Keith, the Health Policy Center and Legal Director of O’Neill National and Global Health Law, said, “If these benefits are eliminated or are accused when they go to a doctor for preventive treatment, people will know.
But if the court agrees that the Task Force is controlled by the Trump administration by the Minister of Health and Human Service, the current Robert F. Kennedy JR., the report can be changed. Kennedy can dismiss the task force and appoint a more friendly member to his agenda, or compel his own decisions, experts said.
Tim Jost, an expert and honorary professor of health law at the University of Washington and Lee University, said, “The motivation of the Trump administration is always expanding the power of the president and the Minister of HHS.
Task Force usually updates recommendations every five years to explain medical development or reflect new risk evidence.
Prior to Obamacare, Americans used preventive services in only half of the recommended speed. According to the federal government.
Obama Care survived many challenges.
Affordable Care Act, Obama’s representative domestic achievements, 2,000 or more legal issues I have reached the High Court several times.
In 2012, 2015, and most recently, in 2021, when the court dismissed another challenge to the law, it was supported.
The lawsuit was first heard of the latest challenge that started in the same federal district court in Texas. Critics say that the opponents of Obama Care are looking for a friendly judge, critics say.
Judge Lead O’Connor of Texas said that conservative insurance contractors violate their religious beliefs, so there is no need to deal with HIV-preventive drugs in the insurance plan.
However, O’Connor also agreed that Task Force violated the appointment of the Constitution, which requires the appointment and commercial confirmation of a significant authoritative authority, such as cabinet assistants and other supervisors.
New Orleans Based 5th The US Court of Appeals supported the decision, but withdrew the O’Connor’s ruling.
The BIDEN administration asked the Supreme Court to file a case to prevent a national lawsuit, which agreed on the just before the new administration took office.
The Trump administration is defending the law.
Unlike the initial legal challenge of Obama Care when the first Trump administration does not defend the law, the Second Trump administration’s Justice Department claims that the Task Force does not violate the Constitution.
The government said that it is not a task force, not a task force, not a task force. According to the Ministry of Justice, the minister may be delayed to prevent it from rejecting or fermenting it.
But the challengers pointed out that the Task Force members and their recommendations are “independent and do not affect political pressure within an executable range.”
“The minister does not have the authority to remove the Task Force member or reject the recommendation due to the independence requirements.” Talked to the court. “Even if he does that,” direction “and” directors “will not be enough.”
The government argues that independence requires that the task force should be recommended in accordance with fair medical and public health rulings.
The Ministry of Justice said, “It does not mean that the secretary was forbidden to determine whether the task force recommended a legal effect. I told the Supreme Court.
And if the judges do not agree, they will continue to destroy the “independent” guidelines and fully deploy the task force under the secretary’s control.
Regardless of the results, public health advisors are expected to continue to fight for the scope of prevention services.
“I think this is the first example of actually testing water.” And I don’t think this will end with this. “
