Remote health is expanding access to the treatment of material disorders in rural areas, but New study We suggest that we cannot properly provide services to beneficiaries.
For journalists who deal with rural health imbalances, medicaid cliffs and promises of remote health (and traps), these discoveries require a detailed look at those who actually benefit from the remote health boom.
The remote health services for the treatment of drug use have soared from 45 services a month to almost 11,000 by 2023 in 2019.
This study, which analyzed claim data nationwide from 2019 to mid -203, focuses on the use of drug use disorders that compare the direct and remote health methods in the rural and urban areas, and the direct and remote health methods of rural and urban areas. The result is especially related State and federal policies are increasingly emphasizing remote health. As a means of improving accessibility in the treatment of substance disorders, especially in the marginalized areas.
This study showed two very different trends. On the other hand, the rural community is gaining serious benefits. The overall use of drug abuse treatment in rural population increased almost 90% during the study, which was almost twice as much as the urban area. This suggests that remote health is helping to bridge the geographical gap in approaching treatment.
Questions worth exploring
The study also discovered an imbalance in the problem that affects Medicide beneficiaries. Despite the overall increase in remote health -based therapy, those people guaranteed by Medicaid have actually reduced the use of overall services by 17%. This means that remote health has increased, but it has not replenished the decline in visits and can leave a potentially vulnerable population. Less access to treatment.
As pointed out by the research author, this raises serious equity issues. Do you have a digital literacy barrier? Lack of access to trusted internet? Is the provider that is likely to provide remote health to patients with Medicaid?
Look at how socioeconomic factors affect accessibility and whether the trends are different for other types of material use disorders and investigate the quality of treatment delivered through remote health. Is the result as good as direct treatment? How about patient satisfaction and compliance?
The use of remote health in the United States has been noted for six months to 2024 compared to the peak of Covid-19 Pandemic. It was a remote volume 54.7% lower in the third quarter of 2023 than in the second quarter of 2023. Declaration is due to the preferred nursing care and limited effects of remote health in certain medical specialists.
Racial and ethnic imbalances continue in remote health.
Virtual medical advocates have long been throwing video and audio -based medical promises by reaching the population that reached the population of healthy health care, including races and people faced with additional obstacles to medical services. But recent research General Internal Medicine Journal Texas’s federal health center tested patients and black patients were 35% less likely to use virtual therapy than white patients and 51% lowered in Hispanic patients. The gap can be due to digital division. It is unlikely that certain groups know how to use or use technology.
As you can see in this latest study, registrants and commercial insurance of Medicare Advantage are more likely to use remote health, emphasizing the gap between approach and needs. As policymakers continue to form remote health regulations, this study emphasizes the need for a much more subtle approach. Remote health is not a magic bullet, and its impact varies greatly depending on who you are and where you live.
